mikehudack:

Unlike a great many “liberals,” Im not opposed to teaching creationism in schools. I don’t see anything wrong with it. More than half of Americans (55%) believe that God created man in his current form. It would be a sad error for our education system to ignore this fact.

(via mikehudack)

You don’t see anything wrong with teaching not-science as science?

(via trainwrecks)

Sure I do. I don’t think I suggested that you teach it as science. But I do believe that you should present it as a point of view that is widely held within the general population. I think you should be respectful of this view. I don’t think you should present it as science, though, and I’m not entirely sure that it should be taught in science class (maybe religion class would be a more appropriate place for it). I don’t think it should be completely ignored, though.

Are you so scared of creationism that you want to ban it from our schools? Is it such a dangerous idea that we must ensure that our children are never exposed to it?

Why would it be okay to teach anything in schools which is demonstrably false? A class on religion would be fine with me if there was time for it but I can’t see it as a priority.

Notes

  1. mikehudack reblogged this from spytap and added:
    Understood. I get it. But when do you discuss it? It’s logical to discuss it at the same time as evolution. Do you...
  2. spytap reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    Worth pointing out though that in your comparative religion class, Islam and Judaism are, in fact, religions. This was...
  3. wiesen reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    Eh - I went to an artsy high school in Marin County and I’m all about freewheeling discussion, but frankly I don’t think...
  4. mattlehrer reblogged this from mikehudack and added:
    most of what you wrote here...difference between (1) “Im not opposed
  5. mattlehrer posted this